Congress can codify sensible National Institutes of Health research rules


Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Stumble It Email This More...

THE SWIRL of controversy that greeted President Obama’s executive order lifting the ban on federal funding of stem cell research in March didn’t make a significant return when the final rules were released over the summer. That’s because the National Institutes of Health successfully navigated a minefield of ethical and moral questions. To protect those regulations from politics and changes by another administration, Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) soon will introduce the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2009. The legislation would codify Mr. Obama’s executive order permitting federal funding of such research within guidelines established by the NIH and would require that they be reviewed periodically (…)

Mr. Obama’s executive order overturned one issued by President George W. Bush in 2001 that allowed federal funding only for those stem cell lines already developed. Scientists ultimately found the number of approved lines too few and the utility of those lines limited.

For facilities with stem cell lines developed on or before July 7, the NIH will establish a committee of scientists, ethicists and advocates to examine on a case-by-case basis the procedures and paperwork to determine whether the lines were derived with voluntary informed consent from donors and in a manner consistent with the new rules. This panel would also make the same evaluation of stem cell lines originating outside the United States. There are an estimated 700 stem cell lines already in existence.

The bill specifically outlaws human cloning, as do the NIH guidelines. And Congress already prohibits federal funding for collecting stem cell lines from human embryos, which are destroyed in the process. But the NIH rules make it clear that taxpayer money will not be used on lines from embryos created solely for research. The life-saving treatments and therapies that could result from stem cell research should not come from crossing this clear moral and ethical boundary.

from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100904188.html

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Maybe you can find something interesting in the following sponsored links:


Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Stumble It Email This More...
Related pages on the web
  • Screw You Economics: My Most Hated Stealth Fees and How to Get Around Them. It's a shame that our present economy has developed a deep seeded justification for screwing over consumers. Not only are we going to do it, but we're going to turn a profit doing it! Today's culture has become so cynical...
  • Anyone up for some test-tube grown steak? I really dont know what to think of this article as I dont know if its right or not. I mean, what REALLY is the difference between eating a "regular" cow that was born to a mother and raised in...
  • Green Hybrid Electric Vehicle Batteries With all the new choices emerging in the field of green hybrid electric vehicles these days, it pays to you know your way around them. Since the technology isn't going to go anywhere—in fact, it looks like it's about to...
  • Britain, US funding Yemen anti-terror police unit - Yahoo! News LONDON – The British government said Sunday that Prime Minister Gordon Brown and President Barack Obama have agreed to back a counterterrorism police unit in Yemen to tackle the rising terrorist threat from the country. In an e-mailed statement, Brown's...
  • Be Careful When Attempting Faith Based Investing Faith Based Investing is starting to get some press and investment companies are hearing the call, creating funds to meet that demand.  While I am Christian (Greek Orthodox to be exact) I am not a hardcore religious guy, so I don’t...
Blog Traffic Exchange Related articles on this site

0 Responses to “Congress can codify sensible National Institutes of Health research rules”


  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply