Don’t sell out on stem cell research

I just had a birthday, and to honor such occasions, my sister always gives me silver. Not just any silver: It’s our parents’ simple wedding flatware pattern, which Margaret collects for me, one piece at a time. Over the years that the slender boxes have appeared, I’ve wondered if any of it is from the full service for 12 that I pulled in a suitcase through Manhattan’s Diamond District and sold one dreadful day 25 years ago.

It had been my assignment to sell it —- that, and a ring of Margaret’s, one of mine and, right off our mother’s finger, her engagement ring and platinum wedding band. The sum received was probably a quarter of their monetary worth, and nothing near their emotional value, but it financed two more weeks of home care for our mother, an Alzheimer’s patient. After five years of caring for her at home, we had run through the family savings.

It was a few years before the sale of the silver that I first wrote about us, in a 1983 magazine article that, impossible as it may seem now, introduced Alzheimer’s disease to millions of people who didn’t know what it was, including the seasoned magazine editor to whom I first pitched the story. Last Sunday, HBO began a three-night series, produced by California’s first lady, Maria Shriver, about a disease that now needs no introduction.

When I first wrote about Alzheimer’s, I searched out some of the best minds of the time, including Lewis Thomas, the great science writer, former dean of Yale Medical School and then-chancellor of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. He called Alzheimer’s disease “the disease of the century” because, he said, “of all the health problems in the 20th century, this one is the worst.”

That quote got people’s attention, as did the words “angry, incompetent, hostile and incontinent,” which is how I described my mother. She was then 51, two years younger than I am now. I exposed her for who she had become in exchange for the attention I hoped the article might bring for her disease.

In years that followed, congressional hearings were held, state task forces were convened and city committees were formed. Research dollars were allotted as well. But those were the 1980s, when Ronald Reagan was president, and despite the fact that embryonic stem cell research had been conducted in the U.S. since the middle of the 20th century, contributing to such wonders as vaccines for both rubella and polio, it was rebranded and became strongly associated with abortion. In the years that followed, despite the well-known fact that stem cell research was the most promising path to finding cures for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, diabetes, multiple sclerosis and other diseases, this country allowed the personal beliefs of the anti-abortion forces to become public policy. And that lasted a very long time.

read more on AJC

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Maybe you can find something interesting in the following sponsored links:

Related pages on the web
  • The New Atheism - Part Deux The Christian religion promises eternal life in a paradise for those who are qualified and punishment for those who don't measure up. Atheists settle for eating, drinking, and being merry (much of the merriment being provided by poking fun at...
  • HTC T-Mobile G2 Android Phone ... and More New HTC Phones.mp4 tinyurl.com We arecurrently recruiting new product testers to try the G2 phone by Google. Go to the above URL, select G2 Android from the drop down list. Use Code G2GOOG as your coupon code. Become a panel member, which gives...
  • It's Tennis Month! The once number one player Tommy Haas, Mardy Fish and Ivan Ljubicic put in some great efforts in the Masters at Madrid this week. Tommy Haas who had to qualify managed to pull it out against Ernests Gulbis in three...
  • Ramifications for Woods and his sport unfolding [/caption] By DOUG FERGUSON (AP) Stewart Cink was at a birthday party when he learned about Tiger Woods taking an indefinite leave from golf. A friend had the news on his cell phone, and even as the page loaded with...
  • Is it Unethical to Invest in Diseases that Can Be Treated, But Never Cured? As someone who spent most of their career working in the biotechnology industry, I occasionally forget that my salary was paid by some unfortunate soul who had a pretty nasty disease.  Diseases like cancer, extreme hemophilia, or multiple sclerosis were used...
Blog Traffic Exchange Related articles on this site

0 Responses to “Don’t sell out on stem cell research”


  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply




Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin